A Correction to Classical Review

[author unknown]
The Classical Review 10 (3):174-174 (1896)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Instead of : ‘I propose to read the last vs. tua est; lecto, etc’ read : I presume that the copyist had before him tuus est lecto, etc., which, by a palaeographic error, became tuus est legio—and then, by grammatical correction, tua est legio—.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0009840x00203740

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

‘Glossae Collectae’ in Vat. Lat. 1469. Catomvm. Navmachia.W. M. Lindsay - 1921 - Classical Quarterly 15 (1):38-40.
The Date of the Disappearance of Legio XXI. Rapax.G. L. Cheesman - 1909 - The Classical Review 23 (05):155-.
Errata.[author unknown] - 1920 - The Classical Review 34 (1-2):48-48.
"Cartas pedagógicas": escuela popular Aipe-primaria, lecto-escritura, escuela nueva, Piaget, etc.J. Mejía & Marco Raúl - 1987 - [Bogotá]: Centro de Investigación y Educación Popular.
A Document of the Restored Democracy of 410 B.C.H. T. Wade-Gery - 1930 - Classical Quarterly 24 (2):116-118.
Cuneus, Phalanx und Legio.M. Reinhold - 1943 - Classical Weekly 37:103-104.
Opera and Operae est.S. J. - 1894 - The Classical Review 8 (08):345-347.
Quis Erus Est?A. S. Gratwick - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (02):123-.
Satira τoτa Nostra Est.W. Rennie - 1922 - The Classical Review 36 (1-2):21-.
Marxvs Dixit: Ita Est. [REVIEW]H. J. Rose - 1950 - The Classical Review 64 (3-4):127-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
3 (#1,854,468)

6 months
2 (#1,693,059)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references