Conflict and decision

Philosophy of Science 34 (2):188-193 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Howard Kahane's current reply to my previous discussion of Goodman's elimination rules, he suggests both that the notion of conflict required by the first elimination rule cannot be made clear, and that both proposed revisions of the second elimination rule are too strong [4]. These seem to me to be the points which require settlement, and I would like to discuss them in this paper.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/288143

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,804

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Ackermann.Howard Kahane - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):184-187.
Reduction, elimination, and firewalking.Colin Cheyne - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):349-357.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-21.
The Calculus of Higher-Level Rules, Propositional Quantification, and the Foundational Approach to Proof-Theoretic Harmony.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (6):1185-1216.
Eight Rules for Implication Elimination.Michael Arndt - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier, Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 239-273.
Against the Unrestricted Applicability of Disjunction Elimination.Marcel Jahn - 2017 - Rerum Causae 9 (2):92-111.
Bilateral Inversion Principles.Nils Kürbis - 2022 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 358:202–215.
Tautology Elimination, Cut Elimination, and S5.Andrezj Indrzejczak - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (4):461-471.
Tautology Elimination, Cut Elimination, and S5.Andrzej Indrzejczak - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (4):461-471.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#263,654)

6 months
20 (#153,892)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Discussion: Nelson Goodman's entrenchment theory.Howard Kahane - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):377.
Projecting unprojectibles.Robert J. Ackermann - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):70-75.
Reply to Ackermann.Howard Kahane - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):184-187.

Add more references