The Logic of Ethical Intuitionism

International Journal of Ethics 44 (1):37-55 (1933)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers have in the past had difficulty in determining how to define ethical terms. here they are defined as open-context terms with a loosely limited range of substitution instances, in conformity with actual language usage. ethical terms are in themselves meaningless. it is a misuse to say, "x is wrong in itself." ethical terms then reduce to empirical terms concerning wants, likes, knowledge of cause and effect and consequences, knowledge of how ethical terms themselves work. ethical commands reduce to if-then statements. blame may possibly never make sense

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Scope of Moore's Ethical Intuitionism.Ali Akbar Abdolabadi - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 3 (210):119-130.
Ethical judgments and intentions: a multinational study of marketing professionals.Aysen Bakir Scott J. Vitell - 2003 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 12 (2):151-171.
Wicked problems in design and ethics.Ben Sweeting - 2018 - In Peter Jones & Kyoichi Kijima (eds.), Systemic Design: Theory, Methods, and Practice. Springer Japan.
Moral functionalism, supervenience and reductionism.Frank Jackson & Philip Pettit - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):82-86.
Scientific ethos and ethical dimensions of education.Sergey B. Kulikov - 2022 - International Journal of Ethics Education 7 (2):307-324.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
508 (#55,987)

6 months
17 (#177,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references