A Critique of the “Common Ownership of the Earth” Thesis

Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 8 (2):33-40 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In On Global Justice, Mathias Risse claims that the earth’s original resources are collectively owned by all human beings in common, such that each individual has a moral right to use the original resources necessary for satisfying her basic needs. He also rejects the rival views that original resources are by nature owned by no one, owned by each human in equal shares, or owned and co-managed jointly by all humans. I argue that Risse’s arguments fail to establish a form of ownership at all and, moreover, that his arguments against the three rival views he considers all fall short. His argument establishes, rather, a moral constraint on any conventional system of property ownership.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
633 (#43,877)

6 months
99 (#64,056)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arash Abizadeh
McGill University

Citations of this work

Reply to Abizadeh, Chung and Farrelly.Mathias Risse - 2013 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 8 (2):62-73.
Commons, Communes, and Freedom.Harrison Frye - 2022 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 21 (2):228-244.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references