The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.
Question | Answer | Comments | |
A priori knowledge: yes or no? | Accept: yes | | |
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism? | Lean toward: Platonism | | |
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective? | Accept both | Some aesthetic pleasure can be evil, so it's not entirely subjective, but aesthetic value is not the same for everyone everywhere. | |
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? | Accept: yes | | |
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism? | Accept: internalism | No question. Norman! | |
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism? | Agnostic/undecided | Sometimes I'm a transcendental idealist; sometimes, a skeptic; most often, lately, a naive realist. | |
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will? | Lean toward: libertarianism | | |
God: theism or atheism? | Lean toward: theism | That's a tough one. I'm not sure whether I accept or merely lean toward. | |
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? | Lean toward: rationalism | At least some true propositions, if known, are not known purely on the basis of experience. So I guess I lean toward rationalism. | |
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism? | Other | Contextualist, in the sense that different contexts call for different *senses* of 'know' - not in the sense that the same sense of 'know' requires different degrees of justification in different contexts. | |
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Logic: classical or non-classical? | Accept: classical | | |
Mental content: internalism or externalism? | Lean toward: internalism | | |
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? | Accept: moral realism | | |
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? | Lean toward: non-naturalism | Only because 'naturalism' is not a well-behaved word... | |
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism? | Other | I think my views here might be incoherent. | |
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism? | Accept: cognitivism | | |
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? | Accept: externalism | | |
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes? | The question is too unclear to answer | The problem is described in various ways; I'm not sure which is the standard. | |
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics? | Lean toward: deontology | | |
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? | Lean toward: psychological view | | |
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Proper names: Fregean or Millian? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism? | Lean toward: scientific realism | | |
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death? | Agnostic/undecided | Agh! I'd rather not think about it... | |
Time: A-theory or B-theory? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch? | Accept: switch | | |
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic? | Accept: correspondence | | |
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible? | Lean toward: inconceivable | | |